I'm pretty sure, given Matt's history of acting erratically and in a way that harms innocent people, that the questions asked were in good faith. If no legal i

I'm pretty sure, given Matt's history of acting erratically and in a way that harms innocent people, that the questions asked were in good faith. If no legal interpretation of that checkbox would reach that same conclusion, Matt would have just said that, rather than banning the questioner and leaving the question unanswered except for 'contact a lawyer'. The best way to "solve" the situation would be Matt acknowledging he was in the wrong to harm innocent people, and simply remove the unnecessary checkbox. The only reason it exists is his personal crusade against WPEngine and anyone and anything associated with it "in any way".