There's nothing particularly wrong with this article. It describes some aspects of PHP. It's just that Atwood's article describes PHP much better. (http://www.

There's nothing particularly wrong with this article. It describes some aspects of PHP. It's just that Atwood's article describes PHP much better. (http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/06/the-php-singularity.html http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/06/the-php-singularity...) I think the latter view is spot-on, and nikic's view here just serves as a perfect example of why certain people are still addicted to their awkward toolset.