3 ms·
Reminder for anyone here who has imposter syndrome: Highly paid engineers built a system this way. I also have doubts they were specifically instructed to mak
by gjsman-1000 2y ago
Reminder for anyone here who has imposter syndrome:
Highly paid engineers built a system this way.
I also have doubts they were specifically instructed to make the infrastructure non-transferable.
- mbreese 2y agoI’m also pretty sure they never expected to have to support transferring a car to a different infrastructure. Because if they ever needed to, that meant the company failed. Oh wait…
- ggm 2y agoShort of failure, was buy out and/or IPO with a single purchasor taking it private, or fusion with another company. There were scenarios down the track requiring porting the customer base into another data model that a competent design team would have in the brief, given a competent leadership. oh wait...
- whatshisface 2y ago"I'm going to need you to stay late this weekend, we're developing capabilities for a scenario where you've all been laid off."
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- steve_adams_86 2y agoAre we sure they were highly paid? Maybe that was part of the problem.
- cr3ative 2y agoI’m not overly surprised that in a startup, there was no mechanism built to split off a small defined portion of their fleet to a different, independent cloud. Bit different to changing the whole infrastructure out for every car in a disaster recovery situation.