3 ms·
Its not about revision history. That's just one of 429 contradictory reasons that matt has given for why he's doing this. Dont take ANYTHING that guy says at fa
by nchmy 2y ago
Its not about revision history. That's just one of 429 contradictory reasons that matt has given for why he's doing this. Dont take ANYTHING that guy says at face value - he's a psychopath
Youre absolutely right though - WP dot com is by far the worst offender of his own standards.
- dylan604 2y agoat some point the disagreement about revision history will be settled through revisionist history
- AdamJacobMuller 2y agoRevision history is the only fig leaf here though about wp-engine being "bastardized wordpress" ? I suppose I understand the argument about wp-engine using significant wordpress.org resources has some merit (but is entirely unrelated to the bastardization argument) if wp-engine is just fetching things like wordpress updates and plugin lists and plugin updates, etc, all directly from wordpress.org servers on a per-blog basis but I find it hard to believe that wp-engine doesn't cache or have their own layer for that.