4 ms·
It makes sense with GETs if you’re opinionated I think. This way an in-flight request has a chance to complete (otherwise if you send requests too often none o
by dullcrisp 2y ago
It makes sense with GETs if you’re opinionated I think.
This way an in-flight request has a chance to complete (otherwise if you send requests too often none of them would ever finish), but any request that hasn’t started yet isn’t sent since it’s meant to be overwritten by the result of the later request anyway. Of course if you expect later requests to do anything other than idempotently replace the previous ones you’ll be surprised.