3 ms·
"that" was referring to your reply to their straightforward yes/no question being anything but.
by ThePowerOfFuet 2y ago
"that" was referring to your reply to their straightforward yes/no question being anything but.
- neilperetz 2y agoSo you interpret "is there any part of the Wordpress cluster of organizations that do not ultimately answer to Matt?" as being a YES or NO question? I interpret it as a request for information about what is Matt's role in the ecosystem and I was gathering information to share about that. However, if you are not interested in factual information, the answer is: YES, there are various parts of the the Wordpress cluster of organizations that do not ultimately answer to Matt.
- slenk 2y agoWhich ones aren't under his control? HR? Legal? Because no sane person would be letting him do this
- pwillia7 2y agoWhile I love the use of passive aggressive language, in this case, as it was originally written, "However, if you are not interested in factual information, the answer is: YES" causes some globule of confusion to the primary reader -- Is this to imply that the answer Yes to the question about Matt's control over the organizations named WordPress is _not_ in fact factual? Dictated not read. YMHAOS