4 ms·

Yeah, that could totally be by design. For example,the book "Rainbows End" is not "Rainbow's End" specifically because the meaning of the first is intended, not

• hcs 2y ago
  Though when it comes up in the book it's clear that it was a mistake (or a cruel joke) in that context.
  • underlipton 2y ago
    In the book's context. But in the meta-context of why it's in the book, the author's intent is to fool you into thinking it's a mistake, when it actually isn't. Specifically, it's supposed to suggest the technological singularity not being a pot of gold but the death of history (and possibly humanity).