> 2. allows use, modification, and redistribution with minimal restrictions to protect the producer's business model As my three year old is rather fond of say

> 2. allows use, modification, and redistribution with minimal restrictions to protect the producer's business model As my three year old is rather fond of saying when he disagrees with my opinion: "no, try again." I think the intention is good, but the approach is fraught with risk. > (You may think point 2 is vague — and it is — intentionally. Since business models vary, this invites exploration in new licenses outside of the current suite of fair source licenses.) Right. And when your business model changes, bringing it into conflict with mine? "Exploration" sounds like another word for "pay money or fight lawsuit". The point of a license is to set expectations between parties. When those aren't clear, then a license isn't doing its primary job.