> It seems that it doesn’t so much “have a very clear definition” as a small faction are attempting to create a definition. We are indeed trying to define it b

> It seems that it doesn’t so much “have a very clear definition” as a small faction are attempting to create a definition. We are indeed trying to define it but this was a response to "implies some sense of 'fairness' which can mean drastically different things to people". It has a clear definition, but the interpretation and the consequence on that definition are in relation to a business. I don't think however that is any different to how the consequences of an Open Source license are specific to the license or the company that runs it. A GPL software with a CLA is very different than a GPL software without a CLA. > Which, I suppose, is a roundabout way of saying: “fair” to whom? The goal of the FSL is to ensure that you have aligned incentives as a company with all the users that you have, and you protect yourself against free loaders. I wrote down my thoughts on a longer version a while back here: https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2024/9/23/fsl-agpl-open-source-businesses/ https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2024/9/23/fsl-agpl-open-source-busi...