4 ms·
agreed. I do want to see a proper definition which could be explained better legally. But the idea is pretty good in my opinion (unless you are one of those p
by Imustaskforhelp 2y ago
agreed.
I do want to see a proper definition which could be explained better legally.
But the idea is pretty good in my opinion (unless you are one of those people who want open source to be free labour for your company)
- alwa 2y agoAgreed on that aspect, too: the basic idea seems more than reasonable (use my work, just be a good neighbor, remember your roots and give a bit back if our work helps you succeed). And I agree with the author that this is something that’s both coherent and distinct from source-available and OSS. My discomfort—setting aside whether such an idea is workable in license form—is mainly with the choice of a moralizing descriptor for such a license.