3 ms·
Does not seem to be true. See https://news.cancerresearchuk.org/2012/08/15/is-being-inactive-really-as-bad-as-smoking/ https://news.cancerresearchuk.org/2012/08
by onli 2y ago
Does not seem to be true. See https://news.cancerresearchuk.org/2012/08/15/is-being-inactive-really-as-bad-as-smoking/ https://news.cancerresearchuk.org/2012/08/15/is-being-inacti...
- testmasterflex 2y agoDoesn’t mention how much smoking is worse.
- onli 2y agoNot with clear numbers, but with clear qualifiers: > But to an individual, inactivity is certainly _not_ worse than smoking. > Being inactive increases the risk of a number of diseases, including a several types of cancer. Smoking _massively_ increases the risk of over a dozen types of cancer, as well as causing emphysema, heart disease, stroke and other diseases.