3 ms·
It is a lie on part of Mozilla. A logic that only makes sense with a lot of false premises, like the necessity and inevitably of surveillance advertising. A sim
by raxxorraxor 2y ago
It is a lie on part of Mozilla. A logic that only makes sense with a lot of false premises, like the necessity and inevitably of surveillance advertising. A simple legislative change and all that would be illegal without it hitting the economy at all with exception of some parts of the advertising industry.
I don't know what changed for Mozilla, but this doesn't look like a way into the future.
Or maybe they want to go that way, but they then should release Firefox/Thunderbird from ambitions like these. These project had other goals than what Mozilla today espouses.
- JohnFen 2y ago> It is a lie on part of Mozilla. I agree. > A simple legislative change There's no such thing as a "simple legislative change" when big money and powerful companies are involved.
- raxxorraxor 2y agoTrue. It would only technically be simple, not politically. This reluctance of legislative forces should be remembered when they try to get power over social media or other platforms to "protect the kids".