3 ms·

the marco civil da internet has provisions to take illegal content published in sites or social media via court order..

• matheusmoreira 2y ago
  It doesn't matter what lesser laws say if the constitution says otherwise. Constitution says manifestation of thought is free and censorship is illegal. > Term IX. > expression of intellectual, artistic, scientific, and communication activity is free, independent of any censorship or license If your speech hurts somebody, they get to answer and to be made whole. The original insult is not censored. We see it all the time with politicians insulting and threatening each other. The other party sues, judiciary applies a fine, that's all there is to it.
  • tmottabr 2y ago
    Sure.. but this law was never challenged and thus it was never deemed unconstitutional.. Something only the supreme court can do when the proper process is started.. Until this happen the courts must assume the law is valid and apply it as such..