3 ms·
Lunar Lake gaming performance is incredible on Windows. It makes me want the Steam Deck 2 to be based on the next Intel platform. That said, the Linux graphics
by Sakos 2y ago
Lunar Lake gaming performance is incredible on Windows. It makes me want the Steam Deck 2 to be based on the next Intel platform. That said, the Linux graphics drivers are terrible (https://www.phoronix.com/review/lunar-lake-xe2 https://www.phoronix.com/review/lunar-lake-xe2) and the Phoronix benchmarks for Lunar Lake overall (outside of gaming: https://www.phoronix.com/review/core-ultra-7-lunar-lake-linux https://www.phoronix.com/review/core-ultra-7-lunar-lake-linu...) showed terrible performance in all sorts of aspects, jesus. Xe2 is a huge win, the rest not so much.
- automatic6131 2y agoMSI Claw 2 might, given it's original is Meteor Lake based. But it sold like ** so there may not be a successor
- Sakos 2y agoDid the first claw even sell well? That said, the Steam Deck competitors aren't interesting to me without the touchpads and four back buttons.
- automatic6131 2y ago>Did the first claw even sell well? Extremely poorly. The worst of all deck-likes.
- kaliqt 2y agoNo. And I know this by the sheer lack of videos and discussion of any kind on it.
- skavi 2y agoGPU benchmarks in TFA are run on Windows: https://open.substack.com/pub/chipsandcheese/p/lunar-lakes-igpu-debut-of-intels?utm_campaign=comment-list-share-cta&utm_medium=web&comments=true&commentId=71925903 https://open.substack.com/pub/chipsandcheese/p/lunar-lakes-i...
- Sakos 2y agoWeird. I've seen far better results elsewhere.
- formerly_proven 2y agoWith totally new hardware platforms things often take a minute to really work (even on Windows).