> (way under-calling the amount of data human vision reports I would suggest) It doesn't matter because the amount of meaningful data for learning is accessibl

> (way under-calling the amount of data human vision reports I would suggest) It doesn't matter because the amount of meaningful data for learning is accessible at a lower resolution. If someone is born with bad vision such that they effectively see at 1/2 or 1/4th of the resolution of a normal person, It's not like they will grow up to be stupid (as long as they can sit in the front of the class to see the chalkboard). In order for visual quality to impair learning it would need to be pretty bad such that you couldn't make out objects or symbols at a reasonable range.