3 ms·
> These accounts were engaged in political speech. The judge ordered their banishment. Wrong. The accounts with orders for blocking were pushing a doxxing camp
by Qem 2y ago
> These accounts were engaged in political speech. The judge ordered their banishment.
Wrong. The accounts with orders for blocking were pushing a doxxing campaign against police investigators tasked with the January 8 coup attempt investigation. Doxxing/threats probably aren't protected speech anywhere in the world.
- matheusmoreira 2y agoAnd where did you read this? The orders are secret. The accusations are secret. The lawyers involved are secret. I read them when they were published and the only name in there is Alexandre de Moraes. And I certainly did not witness anything you speak of. I don't remember reading any news of any "doxxing campaign" either. As far as I know, these are just politician accounts. Someone here on HN once asked who the people named in the court orders were. I found nothing related to what you said when I looked them up on the internet. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41420849 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41420849 Worst guy in there seems to be the guy who told Bolsonaro to order the military to close down the supreme court. Inciting the armed forces against the other powers is a crime but censoring him for it is still unconstitutional. They even censored their wives and daughters.
- Qem 2y agoIn Portuguese: https://www.uol.com.br/tilt/colunas/carlos-affonso-de-souza/2024/09/14/exposicao-de-delegados-bloqueio-x.htm https://www.uol.com.br/tilt/colunas/carlos-affonso-de-souza/...
- matheusmoreira 2y agoThanks. You're the first person I've encountered who didn't give me the "fake news" angle. It's not clear to me that this kind of doxxing is actually a crime in Brazil though.