It is less about on what reasons made them poor laureates specifically and more important on what is wrong with the process itself Unless the process of select

It is less about on what reasons made them poor laureates specifically and more important on what is wrong with the process itself Unless the process of selection of the committee (unqualified, political) and process of selection of the winner(opaque and inconsistent criteria) is fixed we will have poor candidates winning it in the future too Unlike the economic prize peace was one that Alfred Noble actually wanted himself to be an award given too. One could also argue peace prize should be the most important of them all. Noble wished to mitigate the military application of his invention, the peace prize should be achieving that most. The continued poor judgment of the parliament in selecting the committee and the committee in selecting winners devalues the prize for future winners and devalues the good work the Swedish institutions have put in making it the premier award in their fields