> Your argument is analogous to rock music making kids more violent without there being a direct causal link. No it’s not. Not even remotely. > That is pure

> Your argument is analogous to rock music making kids more violent without there being a direct causal link. No it’s not. Not even remotely. > That is pure semantics. No it’s not. You can’t misread my post and then argue that your interpretation is still correct because of “semantics”. > And if they are really at fault it recently was about removing too much content We might just have to agree to disagree on this.