4 ms·
I see. Then what I wrote, still stands, that is: >> There's zero excuse for hard-wrapping - it actively makes the lives of readers worse. Safari is doing the s
by bmacho 2y ago
I see. Then what I wrote, still stands, that is:
>> There's zero excuse for hard-wrapping - it actively makes the lives of readers worse. Safari is doing the sane and normal thing - soft-wrapping text, because most sane people do not hard-wrap their text, for obvious reasons.
> It breaks poems, code, ascii art, emails, man page, and probably much more that I can't think of.
The alternative of safari's soft wrapping is not "hard wrapping" (which, since Safari is a display, would be the same as soft wrapping), but not wrapping at all, letting the line to go out. Which would be the right thing for poems, code, ascii art, emails, man pages, letters, any structured text, and probably much more.
- throw10920 2y agoOh, I misunderstood - you're right, "not wrapping"/"scrolling" is indeed the right option in this case. I forgot that that was an option. My apologies!