2 ms·
That specific line was baseless speculation. There's nothing to suggest countermeasures at that point and the whole line is redacted. > for the power-hardened
by viraptor 2y ago
That specific line was baseless speculation. There's nothing to suggest countermeasures at that point and the whole line is redacted.
> for the power-hardened facility it is clearly stated at the start
I'm not sure that's as relevant as the page implies. We'd have to know the exact procedures, but having a site with multiple power sources and protections doesn't mean the switching system can never fail. If you have 2 failures in a short time, the best course of action is very likely "stop touching that thing until someone qualified figures out what's going wrong".
- keepamovin 2y agoHeh! :) Okay, I think you might be missing the bigger picture. What is so crazy for you about the idea that there are countermeasures? It does seem like you are trying quite hard to say "This cannot be the case, absolutely."? Also, if you have time, you don't think the first “Installation of the Future” concept prototype... additional microgrids and “self-reliance” power generation systems implies a certain level of technical competence were failures would be highly unusual?