4 ms·
Storage seems reasonable, maybe even a bit too cheap, but the sync minutes look way too expensive. One problem is with end-user monetization: users are used to
by earthnail 2y ago
Storage seems reasonable, maybe even a bit too cheap, but the sync minutes look way too expensive. One problem is with end-user monetization: users are used to pay for storage, but not for how much time they can use your app.
For a small storage-heavy indie app I have, I'd pay $79 for base price, $45 for additional storage, and $1500 for sync minutes.
- theanzelm 2y agoThanks, this is very helpful. If it's unfeasible for a small indie app then that's a bug in the pricing. If you have time, I'd love to hear about your app and work out alternatives (not just for you, but for everyone) anselm@gcmp.io anselm_io on Twitter Or book a chat directly: https://cal.com/anselm-io/talk-about-jazz https://cal.com/anselm-io/talk-about-jazz (everyone else who has opinions on pricing is welcome to do the same)
- pkrulz101 2y agoRandom one, but how do you find using Cal - Im keen to try it out?? I saw it on Onestack.cloud hosted for A$10 per 10 users per month which is pretty decent - our startup has a few founders and are pre-revenue, so means we couldn't really afford per user per month.
- theanzelm 2y agoIt's great! The first really good commercial open source SaaS app in my opinion and a big inspiration
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]