3 ms·
Their vision, which I disagree with, of customer choice, is that its store is an alternative to Steam. Probably they justify their exclusives by not being a mon
by pnt12 2y ago
Their vision, which I disagree with, of customer choice, is that its store is an alternative to Steam. Probably they justify their exclusives by not being a monopoly, which gets weird: steam has the monopoly numbers, but epic has the monopoly practices.
They got a few customers from their giveaways - they should stick to those and further improving their store, maybe some people will actually want to use it.
- madeofpalk 2y agoThere's no such thing as "monopoly practices". Being a monopoly isn't illegal. Exclusivity deals aren't illegal. What's illegal is using your powerful position in a market (a monopoly) to prevent competition. It's really the "prevent competition" bit where companies get in trouble. An exclusivity deal from an upstart could be how they actually enable competition to exist.