>Empirical data continue to show that Microsoft systems are far more vulnerable to exploits than alternatives, particularly Linux and Unix derivatives What emp

>Empirical data continue to show that Microsoft systems are far more vulnerable to exploits than alternatives, particularly Linux and Unix derivatives What empirical data? Care to link to any? If Linux is more secure than Windows, then why does Android have such a huge malware problem? Just read through the latest articles at the below link. https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=android+malware&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest#q=android+malware&hl=en&safe=off&client=opera&hs=Dqz&rls=en&channel=suggest&prmd=imvnsu&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=WNbtT_OFK9Gl6AGnuqWcCg&ved=0CFkQ_AUoBA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=23f0801603fb5e5c&biw=1247&bih=911 https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=... >Nick Petreley's "Security Report: Windows vs Linux: An independent assessment" remains largely valid No, it doesn't.I skimmed through it and it's pretty outdated, especially with the changes in Windows Vista and Windows 7 and with regards to things like IIS.