3 ms·
Did you mean 421? It’s embarrassingly peripheral for now to say that this empirical index (as well as _lambda) is related to “entropy”, or even more shamefully,
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
Did you mean 421? It’s embarrassingly peripheral for now to say that this empirical index (as well as _lambda) is related to “entropy”, or even more shamefully, “sophistication”. Why india not perm, as romer says, population size <-/-> human capital, uk has veto o’er hollywood (only a brit can order hollywood to GTFO) & hollywood has the mandate o heaven, bollywood not (yet) a substitute.
For we need a workable modern definition of lion & fox (the 2 forms of human capital) to cover all the cases. we agree that designori are humans who can switch modes or engage both simultaneously?
[Pants were intended to be a gadget to help foxes adopt a (intellectual) lion mode, or vice versa]
Lion: embraces externalities/expediencies, values unpredictability & loyalty
Fox: rationalizes away externalities, seeks truth, values legibility, respects prowess
(Seems too simple to classify preferred heuristics as DAGs or even poker strats)
[another possible triad is {lion,fox,externality}, so that wolves & traps can be shoved under that last bit]
[you observe that i tried to combine Jacobs & Rao explicitly, Boyd & Nietzsche implicitly]
Concerning historical rhymes, nakamoto “chef marinetti” sakamoto prescribes decentralization, while sam “nielsbohr” altman prescribes AI?
- 082349872349872 2y agoI meant 417, at the margin; adding the 4 (baseline for the penultimate ratio regum) brings us up to 421. In order to increase genus from camiknickers, should we try the XVI: https://blog.bridgemanimages.com/blog/cutting-edge-fashion-the-slashed-sleeve-in-early-modern-europe?offline=1 https://blog.bridgemanimages.com/blog/cutting-edge-fashion-t... , the century of k-clothing? Agreed on designori[0], but as they stand the animals are slightly problematic, for, as proposed, the sly fox seeks truth, and the brave lion camouflages its actions instead of roaring magnificently. (prowess is all over the medi lit for bellatores; I think it's a more recent development that we may speak of le preux Souabe. Did Aramis play the designori?) How about: Leopard: embraces externalities loyal to (direct) superiors values camouflage respects (brute) strength Crow: rationalises externalities loyal to truth (an abstraction) values legibility respects (book) smarts Unlike the popular conception[1] of lions, leopards are known to hide and ambush (they have the spots, after all!); unlike the fox, who's easiest to encounter at dusk and dawn, crows do their thing right out in the open, in the middle of the day, and they don't care who's watching. [I should check the Panchatantra bestiary to see if they have any suitable animals. Adult literature recognises the two strategies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthashastra#On_spying,_propaganda_and_information https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthashastra#On_spying,_propag... ] [0] could their strategies be regular? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_design#Regular_uniform_designs_(configurations) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_design#Regular_uniform_d... [1] is this because lionesses stalk, but lions let them do the hunting? compare "ne parizh"