3 ms·
Apple wasn't ruled not a monopoly. It was ruled that Epic failed to bring convincing evidence and arguments. So yes, Apple could be subject to similar restrict
by tiledjinn 2y ago
Apple wasn't ruled not a monopoly. It was ruled that Epic failed to bring convincing evidence and arguments.
So yes, Apple could be subject to similar restrictions in the future. Either through another monopoly case, or [imo more likely] regulation.