4 ms·
Apple wasn't ruled not a monopoly. It was ruled that the evidence Epic brought in the case was insufficient to show Apple was a monopoly, and the court would en
by tiledjinn 2y ago
Apple wasn't ruled not a monopoly. It was ruled that the evidence Epic brought in the case was insufficient to show Apple was a monopoly, and the court would entertain other arguments in the future.
Apple didn't need to do anything, but they didn't "win" that convincingly.
- brookst 2y agoThat’s splitting hairs. By that logic nobody ever wins when they defend a lawsuit, the plaintiffs just fail to prove their point and different plaintiffs and/or different evidence might prevail in the future.
- jychang 2y agoWell, being dismissed "with prejudice" exists. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/with_prejudice https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/with_prejudice
- entropicdrifter 2y agoYeah, but winning vs winning on all possible fronts is a meaningful distinction. Apple won, they just didn't win as much as possible.