The Epic v Google and Epic v Apple cases are a great showcase about how the law actually works in practice. Epic v Google was a jury trial, and also there was

The Epic v Google and Epic v Apple cases are a great showcase about how the law actually works in practice. Epic v Google was a jury trial, and also there was plenty of evidence in discovery to Epic’s favour[1], and also there was evidence that “Google destroyed evidence and repeatedly gave false info to court”[2]. There was a fair amount of coverage and analysis among legal commentators about why Google lost. It’s worth reading for people interested in trial law. (Especially read [2] about how Google sought to hide conversations from discovery. It’s cringeworthy.) [1] https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/12/tim-sweeney-why-epic-did-better-against-google-than-apple-in-court.html https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/12/tim-sweeney-why-epic-did-bet... [2] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/03/judge-finds-google-destroyed-evidence-and-repeatedly-gave-false-info-to-court/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/03/judge-finds-goog...