4 ms·
I mean there are appropriate applications for advertising (like classifieds in a newspaper), but there is no reason why advertising should be so pervasive that
by beeflet 2y ago
I mean there are appropriate applications for advertising (like classifieds in a newspaper), but there is no reason why advertising should be so pervasive that it requires a massive surveillance apparatus like it does today. Advertisements are the reason why everyone switched from TV to Netflix, and that's back when cable TV was a paid service.
secushare[1] makes the case that this is because the internet lacks a secure micropayments layer, so the funding model for everything has to be advertising-based instead of patronage-based. Paypal and the like are exploited as cash cows because of their centralized nature. Cryptocurrencies were later tried but have technical limitations that broadly prohibit this use case (even with payment channels/LN).
[0] https://secushare.org/broken-internet https://secushare.org/broken-internet
- warkdarrior 2y agoUgh, micropayments again! I have no desire to pay for content or software -- torrents and OSS are all anyone needs.
- beeflet 2y agoIt's mostly about paying for the bandwidth, not the information itself. In the client-server model, the the server owner has to pay for bandwidth and operation costs, which is the justification for advertisements and such. Even in torrents you have private trackers and all of these annoying incentive systems for people to host content. If you had a good reward system on top of bittorrent/IPFS I think that idea could take over the world, but it is not efficient or decentralized to do so.