3 ms·
> Would that be more "fair?" Having the second ruling be consistent with the first? Following precedent? This is terrible for competition where two companies i
by Spivak 2y ago
> Would that be more "fair?"
Having the second ruling be consistent with the first? Following precedent? This is terrible for competition where two companies in the same market can live under different rules in the same jurisdiction.
Apple's monopoly is effectively blessed now.
- wiseowise 2y agoI agree with you. First decision needs to overruled and Apple sued to hell until they comply.
- akira2501 2y agoOne is a Federal criminal case. The other is a Civil damages case. Their format, rulings, and outcomes are not comparable. Nothing in the civil case precludes Apple from receiving a criminal complaint.