5 ms·
It certainly is. Especially lacking in proper comparisons of the final filter with the competition. I myself default to RobidouxSharp for downscaling and someth
by BoingBoomTschak 2y ago
It certainly is. Especially lacking in proper comparisons of the final filter with the competition. I myself default to RobidouxSharp for downscaling and something like https://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?t=21695 https://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?t... for upscaling.
- BoingBoomTschak 2y agoTook the time to make such a comparison using the article's sample images (even if the filter isn't sharpened in those), same thrice doubling of the small picture: http://0x0.st/XEEZ.png http://0x0.st/XEEZ.png I find such a test strange and irrelevant, though.
- dahart 2y agoOoh the animated comparison is really helpful. I couldn’t see it in the article, but with your version the Magic version feels flatter, almost like it’s a bokeh blur and not just a low pass. The Sigmoid seems far better than either Magic or Bicubic.
- svantana 2y agoNice, I agree the lanczos is the best out of the pack.