I understand why the `use` syntax is preferable for its generalizability to many different "callback style" things, but the whole construct of `use foo <- resul

I understand why the `use` syntax is preferable for its generalizability to many different "callback style" things, but the whole construct of `use foo <- result.try(bar())` is so much worse than defining let* in ocaml and being able to write `let* foo = bar() in`...