2 ms·
Or, consider using Wikimedia Commons, where images are painstakingly categorized, documented, and freely licensed: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:
by AStonesThrow 2y ago
Or, consider using Wikimedia Commons, where images are painstakingly categorized, documented, and freely licensed:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pavo_cristatus_(captive,_juvenile) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pavo_cristatus_(...
- BuyMyBitcoins 2y agoI’ve had a mild amount of success asking some nature photographers if they would be willing to make a few of their photos freely licensed so that they can be used on Wikipedia articles. Wikimedia is a fantastic resource.
- AStonesThrow 2y agoCreative Commons offers a portal if you wish to cast a wider net (music, video, 3D models) It also includes Google Images and Flickr. https://search.creativecommons.org/ https://search.creativecommons.org/ I found the peachicks on Commons by searching "peacock" and then following categories up the tree. If people use the wrong search engine with naïve search terms, I don't know what to tell ya. This is a parallel example of why reference librarians are still worth consulting, because they will guide you to the library's resources and databases, and demonstrate how to use search queries.