4 ms·
There may be a small bit of truth in each claim, but they are mostly false. > LLMs and Agents are not automating SWE, but they are changing it. LLMs are maybe
by MeetingsBrowser 2y ago
There may be a small bit of truth in each claim, but they are mostly false.
> LLMs and Agents are not automating SWE, but they are changing it.
LLMs are maybe a slightly larger threat to SWE careers than the ability to copy/paste code from stack overflow.
> Interviews have become nightmares
Interviews if anything have gotten slightly better. Companies stopped asking riddles like, “how many windows are in Seattle”.
> A lot of SWE work is objectively make-work, and a lot of startups are building fluff or things that are net negative to society.
This has been the case for a long long time.
> Beyond this, the supply for SWEs vs the demand is clearly imbalanced on the supply side.
Tech salaries say otherwise. They don’t pay 3-4x the average household income out of kindness.
> Is SWE a sustainable career anymore?
Definitely, though it depends on your definition of sustainable.
If you want a remote position, 30 hour work week, and a $200k+ salary maybe not.
But lots of people will continue to earn a good amount in an overall cushy job as SWEs for the foreseeable future.
- throwaway123198 2y agoAppreciate the response and opinions!
- qazxcvbnmlp 2y agoI have found that if I read the internet, the world (tech employment) is ending. But if I look at my email and messages; there is more work in front of me than I have time to do. It’s probably less sustainable of a career than working for the IRS and more sustainable than working as a musician. Ultimately it comes down to choosing what problems you want to face on a daily basis. If you don’t like excessive change (economic and technological) then it’s probably not a great career for you. If you’re willing to accept those risks and face them like any other problem you will be fine. I use AI on a day to day basis to code, but it’s not going to eliminate my job anytime soon.