3 ms·
those old books are still good though. There's only new syntax for latest ruby versions.
by mooktakim 2y ago
those old books are still good though. There's only new syntax for latest ruby versions.
- int_19h 2y agoIf you compare, say, C++03 and C++14, it's also technically true that "there's only new syntax", but in practice this often means that hacks that used to be idiomatic before are frowned upon now.
- mooktakim 2y agoIts not anything like that. new ruby version has "better" short hands, like {:test => 123} to {test: 123}. Anyway, there have been updated versions of the books and content online if people are interested.
- nextos 2y agoRuby has evolved slowly language-wise compared to C++, or even Python. Most changes have been in libraries and interpreter / VM implementation. Updating your knowledge from Ruby 1.8 (mid 2000s) to 3.x (current) takes little effort. But yes, sparse API documents were always a problem because a big chunk of the community was Japanese.