4 ms·

My definition (again, as a layman on the subject of intelligence philosophy), but your incorrect analysis. I guess I just think more highly of my fellow humans

• exe34 2y ago
  > I guess I just think more highly of my fellow humans. As an article of faith, yes. But I don't see what this adds to the discussion.
  • dartos 2y ago
    > If that's what you've picked for your threshold of "intelligence", you've reduced the majority of the bell curve's left side to soulless automatons I disagree with this statement, which is the crux of their argument against my definition of intelligence. I don’t think any credible survey of the intelligence or lack of a large enough population exists (due to there not being a common binary measure of intelligence), so it’s an issue you kind of need to take on faith.
• ImHereToVote 2y ago
  >so it’s an issue you kind of need to take on faith. Thanks for playing.
  • dartos 2y ago
    It cuts both ways… you need to believe that most humans aren’t actually intelligent as we don’t have any data that suggests that most humans aren’t.
    • exe34 2y ago
      you have no data that suggests I can't fly either.
      • dartos 2y ago
        … but… we do have data that proves that humans can’t just fly? I think… I’m done talking with you now.
        • exe34 2y ago
          you just like your assumptions to go unchallenged. goodbye!