2 ms·
I did mean one public class per file. I didn't mean syntax or core lib to be similar, I just generally meant that both languages impose restrictions on themsel
by raxxorraxor 2y ago
I did mean one public class per file.
I didn't mean syntax or core lib to be similar, I just generally meant that both languages impose restrictions on themselves which might seem sensible at first.
- Ygg2 2y agoJava isn't that restrictive. Rust's type system is much more restrictive and customizable. That said, a good way to think about programs is a series of restrictions, i.e. invariants. Truth be told, only Ada Spark so far really embraced invariants.