4 ms·
I think the reference may have been to the efficacy of the effort at ending the war sooner, which is a topic of some debate I believe. You watch something like
by vundercind 2y ago
I think the reference may have been to the efficacy of the effort at ending the war sooner, which is a topic of some debate I believe. You watch something like 12 O’Clock High and wonder whether this “maximum effort” they were seeking to find (beyond which even the most dedicated and capable crewmen break down) was… worth it.
The deliberate terror bombings that constituted some part of the effort, especially in the mid and late years, were also and separately awful, though the ethics somewhat muddied by the targeting of civilians having undergone a tit-for-tat ratcheting up early in the war, and yeah, the whole death camps thing. But there too the question of whether those deaths served any useful purpose, as far as ending the war sooner or reducing its scope, makes the whole thing even sadder.
- mschuster91 2y ago> But there too the question of whether those deaths served any useful purpose, as far as ending the war sooner or reducing its scope, makes the whole thing even sadder. Well, given that an utter majority were supportive of the Nazi regime up until and even after the war ended... I'd say it was necessary, if only to set an example for any future offender just how brutal the crackdown will be. Unfortunately, the world failed to keep the reminder up on "genocide = bad and WILL lead to a brutal response" - the response towards Serbia in the 90s, Russia after 2014 or Syria was way too lackluster IMHO.