4 ms·
Unfortunately for the intelligence denial crowd, introspection and learning capability is something we can measure, as opposed to the vibes-based discourse you
by welferkj 2y ago
Unfortunately for the intelligence denial crowd, introspection and learning capability is something we can measure, as opposed to the vibes-based discourse you prefer to engage in. If that's what you've picked for your threshold of "intelligence", you've reduced the majority of the bell curve's left side to soulless automatons. Again, your definition, not mine.
- dartos 2y agoMy definition (again, as a layman on the subject of intelligence philosophy), but your incorrect analysis. I guess I just think more highly of my fellow humans.
- exe34 2y ago> I guess I just think more highly of my fellow humans. As an article of faith, yes. But I don't see what this adds to the discussion.
- dartos 2y ago> If that's what you've picked for your threshold of "intelligence", you've reduced the majority of the bell curve's left side to soulless automatons I disagree with this statement, which is the crux of their argument against my definition of intelligence. I don’t think any credible survey of the intelligence or lack of a large enough population exists (due to there not being a common binary measure of intelligence), so it’s an issue you kind of need to take on faith.
- ImHereToVote 2y ago>so it’s an issue you kind of need to take on faith. Thanks for playing.
- dartos 2y agoIt cuts both ways… you need to believe that most humans aren’t actually intelligent as we don’t have any data that suggests that most humans aren’t.