3 ms·
S3 durability is pretty much the only thing I consider worth using EC2 for. S3 egress, on the other hand, is so expensive you can often justify putting a write
by vidarh 2y ago
S3 durability is pretty much the only thing I consider worth using EC2 for.
S3 egress, on the other hand, is so expensive you can often justify putting a writethrough cache for your entire working set at Hetzner...
- ptman 2y agoIIRC Cloudflare R2 is designed as a cache for S3 and has free egress edit: apparently not writethrough: https://developers.cloudflare.com/r2/data-migration/sippy/ https://developers.cloudflare.com/r2/data-migration/sippy/
- jgrahamc 2y agoNo, R2 is not an "S3 cache". It's a replacement for S3 with no egress fees.
- viraptor 2y agoYeah, don't use Sippy. It just stopped working after 2 weeks on multiple buckets and support came back with "have you tried turning it off and on again". It's not production ready. Also R2 is extremely basic compared to S3. For example only trivial permissions are supported and auth tokens are bound to an actual account.