3 ms·
Oh I didn't mean it figured stuff out in a smart way, only that it did auto buffering/chuncking/flushing for you in a way to abstract that whole idea from the d
by nolok 2y ago
Oh I didn't mean it figured stuff out in a smart way, only that it did auto buffering/chuncking/flushing for you in a way to abstract that whole idea from the dev, while other plateform had you care about it (cf above messages).
But yeah the moment you ended up wanting to do anything advanced, you were doing your own buffer on top of that anyway, or disabling it and going raw.
- JodieBenitez 2y agoand the joy of "pure php scripts" with closing ?> tags messing with the output when you didn't want it... all in libraries you had no say... I can't say I miss those days ! Or this platform for that matter.
- lifthrasiir 2y agoEventually people started omitting ?> at the very end, which is correct but also unsettling.
- gary_0 2y agoIt's even recommended in the PHP docs: https://www.php.net/manual/en/language.basic-syntax.phptags.php https://www.php.net/manual/en/language.basic-syntax.phptags....
- earthboundkid 2y agoWhen I started my first job, I was like "Hey, these files don't have a closing ?>!!" and then my boss sighed.
- stefs 2y agoso irksome having to leave the tags unbalanced!