3 ms·
They are controversial because they are not using science in good faith when they contain a call for action. For example, many of those questions require you to
by oceanplexian 2y ago
They are controversial because they are not using science in good faith when they contain a call for action. For example, many of those questions require you to answer if it moral to cause harm to individuals to solve a collective problem.
That’s not science, it’s philosophy.
Look to the history of Eugenics for an example where the scientific community was on the wrong end of history. Science is a tool for understanding, not a way to control people.