4 ms·
Yes! I think I'm going to make LLM bug reproduction my primary response to AI developer maximalists.
by skeptrune 2y ago
Yes! I think I'm going to make LLM bug reproduction my primary response to AI developer maximalists.
- beeflet 2y agoMaybe the solution isn't to train LLMs on human-written code, but to train some sort of text-to-AST generator on descriptions of programs and then the output of programs. That way it doesn't learn to include human-inspired bugs at least.
- mnky9800n 2y agoI always wondered why bother having an AI generate human readable code. Isn't it a machine? Why not have it generate machine code? of course, it wouldn't be readable, but would it be performant? Maybe. I guess my point is that if an AI is doing computing why would it doing computing resemble a person doing it? It's much closer to the machine then me. Why not take advantage of that?
- delapid 2y agoIsn’t that kind of what neural networks are in a way? Large blobs of computation we cant really parse fully
- mnky9800n 2y agoYea but there are a bunch of layers, lol, between that specification and the machine and I'm wondering if there's a way to reduce that assuming it's a bottleneck. But I'm not sure it is I'm just guessing.
- addandsubtract 2y agoBecause then you'd have no control over what the AI/code does. If you blindly want to trust the AI, you might as well just make the AI the black box between your input and output.
- mnky9800n 2y agoHaha what do you think people do with AI/ML? do you think that's currently in control?