5 ms·
> This idea is repeated often in threads like this and I'm not at all sure where it comes from. I think you have a reasonable idea and you’re playing the devil
by stonethrowaway 2y ago
> This idea is repeated often in threads like this and I'm not at all sure where it comes from.
I think you have a reasonable idea and you’re playing the devils advocate.
- lolinder 2y agoI'm definitely not playing devil's advocate, I genuinely and fervently disagree with the notion that the brightest minds of our generation work on (or even adjacent to) ad tech. The only explanation I've been able to come up with for the idea is that some people assume that the "best minds" of our generation will tend to optimize for salary above all else and therefore would (since they're smart enough to find the high salaries) end up working in a FAANG company as a software engineer. That doesn't seem like a very convincing argument (hence, I'm not sure it's actually the origin), but I haven't yet seen a better explanation.
- stonethrowaway 2y agoI’d respond but my commenting is throttled and I’m showing up as [dead] especially with lengthy comments. @dang?
- lolinder 2y ago@dang is a no-op, try the email in the footer.
- 23B1 2y agoIt's an aphorism not a longitudinal study