3 ms·
No, it is called having one's open source output stolen by billionaires who then pay enough apologists, directly or indirectly, to justify the heist.
by lgka 2y ago
No, it is called having one's open source output stolen by billionaires who then pay enough apologists, directly or indirectly, to justify the heist.
- bongodongobob 2y agoNo one stole anything from you. Other than maybe your self esteem.
- LtWorf 2y agoSelf esteem? I mean plagiarism is a compliment. It's also a licence violation and a shame rich capitalists do it to screw everyone else as usual.
- bongodongobob 2y agoHow are rich people screwing you with AI? Which people?
- LtWorf 2y agoPlease don't pretend like you didn't understand. It's not useful.
- loqeh 2y agoAnyone who contradicts a (probably paid) apologist must be either old or lacking in self esteem. Well done, your masters will be happy.
- bongodongobob 2y agolol you think I'm paid to argue with VC bros on Hackernews? "Anyone who contradicts my opinion is paid off" I do it for the love of the game.
- atomic128 2y agoLarge language models are used to aggregate and interpolate intellectual property. This is performed with no acknowledgement of authorship or lineage, with no attribution or citation. In effect, the intellectual property used to train such models becomes anonymous common property. The social rewards (e.g., credit, respect) that often motivate open source work are undermined.