3 ms·
> That's the literal definition of a commons in the political economy sense -- a public resource everyone can take from freely. Part of Ostrom's point is that
by PaulDavisThe1st 2y ago
> That's the literal definition of a commons in the political economy sense -- a public resource everyone can take from freely.
Part of Ostrom's point is that this sort of commons has rarely, if ever, existed. It's a misunderstanding that Hardin's work created or amplified. Resources held in common are in fact always managed and not "free for the taking".
- crazygringo 2y agoWell if modern-day climate change and overfishing in international waters fall into these "rare" examples where the concept is true, then the concept certainly seems important enough to me. I mean, it's mathematically true from a game-theory perspective in the first place. I don't see why you'd want to throw it out.