2 ms·
I had a subscription for a short time in the 2000s, to me it felt like it was too popular and not enough science. It was like the IFL science version of people
by bigfishrunning 2y ago
I had a subscription for a short time in the 2000s, to me it felt like it was too popular and not enough science. It was like the IFL science version of people magazine
National geographic had and has better science content
- Loughla 2y agoI will agree with national geographic. I was afraid it would slip when it was purchased by Murdoch (that's right, isn't it?). But it did not.