7 ms·
"Voting with your wallet" works for small and frequent purchases. The bigger and less frequent the purchase, the less impact it has.
by ysavir 2y ago
"Voting with your wallet" works for small and frequent purchases. The bigger and less frequent the purchase, the less impact it has.
- flaminHotSpeedo 2y agoEspecially for things like cars where there's very few options and most of the auto industry does the same thing. If you have even a single constraint outside the "industry norm" (like a manual transmission in the US, or potentially in the future an AM radio) you are all but guaranteed to have to give up nice to have features and/or pay a lot more
- cvoss 2y agoExactly. And especially when the feature makes up only a tiny fraction of the whole feature set and production cost of the product, consumers are entirely at the mercy of the manufacturers. I'm not going to buy a different make over this. I'm just going to tolerate it unhappily. In the extreme case, manufacturers know that they could get away with dropping this kind of feature even if literally everybody wanted it. In my software development experience, companies invoke this line of reasoning all the time.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]