4 ms·
The power of these tools rests in how common certain patterns of text are in both immediate and superstrucral ways. They force us to admit that with 8B people
by swatcoder 2y ago
The power of these tools rests in how common certain patterns of text are in both immediate and superstrucral ways.
They force us to admit that with 8B people in the world, many of the questions we have and tasks we pursue have already been approximated countless times. They reveal that much of what we do is not so original.
Understanding -- human or machine -- is something different, and enables invention/originality/reflection in a way that recent innovations are still not yet able to acheive on their own.
Importantly, though, students and juniors are specifically being assigned challenges that are already known not to be novel or inventive, which is why these tools can so easily do the work for them. But when when they let the tool do so, they sidestep the unique growth opportunity they were given in the first place.
- dr_dshiv 2y agoOh, so you are in the “it can only do what has already been done camp.” Try to define the terms a bit better and I’ll play. If it can reason through topics that no one has ever reasoned before, are you open to the idea that this is understanding? Or what would you need to see. (Keeping in mind that this is a much higher bar than what we consider understanding in humans.)