3 ms·
Unless the learner is being purposely mislead, it's still learning no matter what the entry point is. Even if the learner is climbing a suboptimal hill, they'r
by echelon 2y ago
Unless the learner is being purposely mislead, it's still learning no matter what the entry point is.
Even if the learner is climbing a suboptimal hill, they're still learning the subject landscape and getting a sense of it. It's still a gradient.
The entire subject of chemistry is like this. They feed you lies and half truths for the first few years of your undergraduate career so that you develop a sense for things. The real model is far too complicated and scary to introduce.
- anon22981 2y agoIt’s possible to learn literally nothing when using a gen ai. You can copy paste stuff without even glancing your code. For student work sized projects I’m sure it’s very doable to have a working product without knowing anything about how it works. Today I wanted to try to create a tool for a game: snapshot a picture and a program recognizes the clipboard event and does image recog things and gives me data. I had a working poc in 3 hours and learned nothing. (Tbf I knew what I wanted and how to do it in general terms so the process might be different for a beginner.)