As I understand it, the EPA is required to reanalyze the current florudation recommendations. > 121. Plaintiffs have proven, by a preponderance of the evidence

As I understand it, the EPA is required to reanalyze the current florudation recommendations. > 121. Plaintiffs have proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that water fluoridation at the level of 0.7 mg/L – the prescribed optimal level of fluoridation in the United States – presents an “unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, without consideration of costs or other non-risk factors, including an unreasonable risk to a potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation under the conditions of use.” 15 U.S.C. § 2620(b)(4)(B)(ii). Full ruling: https://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Court-Ruling.pdf https://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Court-R... The law mentioned: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/2620 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/2620